It seems the our brothers and sisters in The Episcopal Church in America are finally crossing the line in the sand which the drew long ago. This week the House of Bishops of the United States voted to allow the appointment of openly homosexual clergy into all orders of ministry marking what NT Wright and many agree to be a "clear break with the rest of the Anglican Communion."
NT Wright responded to the news in a brilliant op-ed piece for the Times of London, reprinted at the Church of England's online discussion forum. It begins:
In the slow-moving train crash of international Anglicanism, a decision taken in California has finally brought a large coach off the rails altogether. The House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church (TEC) in the United States has voted decisively to allow in principle the appointment, to all orders of ministry, of persons in active same-sex relationships. This marks a clear break with the rest of the Anglican Communion.
Both the bishops and deputies (lay and clergy) of TEC knew exactly what they were doing. They were telling the Archbishop of Canterbury and the other “instruments of communion” that they were ignoring their plea for a moratorium on consecrating practising homosexuals as bishops.
Read more...As a Lutheran, I resonated with several things Wright said.
1. "they have chosen to 'walk apart'."
I find this choice of words to be very interesting, especially in light of our stress and use of the word, Synod, which means "walking together."
2. "Jewish, Christian and Muslim teachers have always insisted that lifelong man-plus-woman marriage is the proper context for sexual intercourse. This is not (as is frequently suggested) an arbitrary rule, dualistic in overtone and killjoy in intention. It is a deep structural reflection of the belief in a creator God who has entered into covenant both with his creation and with his people (who carry forward his purposes for that creation)."
Well said here. I especially like the way he articulates the sanctified life - to carry forward God's purposes in creation. Or as one pastor has put it, "to put on the new creation."
3. "This isn’t a matter of 'private response to Scripture' but of the uniform teaching of the whole Bible, of Jesus himself, and of the entire Christian tradition."
To those who argue against the Biblical view of sexuality, Wright keeps his readers from a subjective, magisterial view of truth and invites us to consider the matter in light of the whole counsel of God. For Wright, this is more than a sociological argument whether or not one's sin harms another person.
4. "Justice never means 'treating everybody the same way', but 'treating people appropriately', which involves making distinctions between different people and situations."
Wright cites The Episcopal appeal to "cut the ethical knot" and move the argument from one of morality to justice, now the highest value in American culture.
There are more good points in this very well-articulated essay. While I believe Wright does an excellent job here, I am saddened by yet another schism in the body of Christ. Thankfully, Jesus is still Lord of the Church and the Gospel proclaimed by our Anglican brothers will be more pure than before. Now that's a line I'm happy to cross.